**Required math: calculus **

**Required physics: **time-independent Schrödinger equation

Reference: Griffiths, David J. (2005), Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, 2nd Edition; Pearson Education – Sec 2.2.

To get the feel of how to solve the time-independent Schrödinger equation in one dimension, the most commonly used example is that of the infinite square well, sometimes known as the ‘particle in a box’ problem. First, recall the Schrödinger equation itself:

Remember that the ‘time-independent’ bit refers to the potential function which is taken to be a function of position only; the wave function itself, which is the solution of the equation, will in general be time-dependent.

The infinite square well is defined by a potential function as follows:

An area with an infinite potential means simply that the particle is not allowed to exist there. In classical physics, you can think of an infinite potential as an infinitely high wall, which no matter how much kinetic energy a particle has, it can never leap over. Although examples from classical physics frequently break down when applied to quantum mechanics, in this case, the comparison is still valid: an infinitely high potential barrier is an absolute barrier to a particle in both cases.

We saw in our study of the time independent Schrödinger equation that separation of variables reduces the problem to solving the spatial part of the equation, which is

where the constant represents the possible energies that the system can have. It is important to note that both and are unknown before we solve the equation. In classical physics, we would be allowed to specify since it is just the kinetic energy that the particle has inside the well. Classically, can be any positive quantity, and the particle would just bounce around inside the well without ever changing its speed (assuming the walls were perfectly elastic and there was no friction). In quantum physics, as we will see, can have only certain discrete values, and these values arise in the course of solving the equation.

In an infinite square well, the infinite value that the potential has outside the well means that there is zero chance that the particle can ever be found in that region. Since the probability density for finding the particle at a given location is , this condition can be represented in the mathematics by requiring if or . This condition is forced from the Schrödinger equation since if , any non-zero value for would result in an infinite term in the equation. However, it is certainly not rigorous mathematics, since multiplying infinity by zero can be done properly only by using a limiting procedure, which we haven’t done here. A proper treatment of the infinite square well is as a limiting case of the *finite* square well, where can have a large but finite value outside the well. However, the mathematics for solving the finite square well is considerably more complicated and tends to obscure the physics. Readers who are worried, however, can be reassured that the energy levels in the finite square well do become those in the infinite square well when the proper limit is taken.

Inside the well, so the Schrödinger equation becomes

This differential equation has the general solution

for unspecified (yet) constants and . If you don’t believe this, just substitute the solution back into the equation.

How can we determine and ? To do this, we need to appeal to Born’s conditions on the wave function. Born’s first condition is clearly satisfied here: is single-valued. The second condition of being square integrable we’ll leave for a minute. The third condition is that must be continuous. We have argued above that outside the well, so in particular, this means that at the boundaries and we must have . If we impose that condition on our general solution above, we get:

where is an integer. The useful values of are just the positive integers. To see this, note that if , then everywhere which besides being very boring, is also no good as a probability density since its square modulus cannot integrate to 1. Negative integers don’t really give new solutions, since so the negative sign can be absorbed into the (still undetermined) constant . Also, the energies depend only on the square of so the sign of doesn’t matter physically.

We can now return to the square-integrable condition and use it to determine . Remember that the integral is over all space in which the particle can be found, so in this case we are interested in .

Since it is only the square modulus of the wave function that has physical significance, we can ignore the negative root and take the final form of the wave function as

Notice what has happened here. Applying the first boundary condition at allowed us to eliminate . But the other boundary condition at ended up giving us a condition on rather than . (Well, ok, we *could* have used the second boundary condition to set but then we would have everywhere again.) Not only that, but the energy levels are discrete; thus the infinite square well is the first case in which the Schrödinger equation has actually *predicted* quantization in a system.

So the boundary conditions on the differential equation have put restrictions on the allowable energies. The acceptable solutions for are determined by the condition and so the various functions are just lobes of the sine function. The lowest energy, called the *ground state*, occurs when and is half a sine wave, consisting of the bit between and . The next state at corresponds to a single complete cycle of the sine wave; contains 1.5 cycles and so on.

Eagle-eyed readers will have noticed that in all the excitement over discovering quantization, we have neglected to look at Born’s fourth condition: that of continuous first derivatives. Clearly this condition is violated, since the derivative of outside the well is 0 (since outside the well), but inside the derivative is which is at and at (the sign depends on whether is odd or even). Neither of these derivatives is zero.

The reason is, of course, because of the infinite potential function which is not physically realistic. In fact, what happens in the (real-world) finite square well is that the wave function inside the potential barrier (that is, just off the ends of the well) is *not* zero, but a decaying exponential which tends to zero the further into the barrier you go. In that case, it *is* possible to make both the wave function and its first derivative continuous at both ends of the well (and it is precisely that condition which makes the mathematics so much more complicated in the finite square well).

In fact, this effect happens in any potential where the energy of the particle is less than that of a (finite) potential barrier: the particle’s wave function extends into the barrier region. So does that mean that the particle has a probability of appearing *inside* a barrier? Technically yes, but in practice it usually doesn’t do the particle much good, since the probability of being outside the barrier is usually a lot greater. However, there is one case where this barrier penetration effect does occur, and that is if the barrier is thin enough for the wave function to have a significant magnitude on the *other* side of the barrier. That is, if we have a particle in a finite well, but the wall of the well is fairly thin and there is another well (or just open space) on the other side of the barrier, then the wave function starts off with a respectable magnitude inside the main well, extends into the barrier (but gets attenuated exponentially in doing so), but before the attenuation gets so severe that the wave function becomes very small, it bursts through to the other side of the barrier. *That* means that, yes, there is a definite probability that the particle can spontaneously appear *outside* the well *without* having to jump over the barrier. In effect, it tunnels through the barrier and escapes. The effect, not surprisingly, is known as *quantum tunneling* and is one of the main causes of some forms of radioactive decay. But that’s a topic for another post.

## Trackbacks

[...] Required physics: Schrödinger equation, particle in a box [...]

[...] Required physics: Schrödinger equation, particle in a box [...]

[...] at this point, we would impose some boundary conditions in an attempt to determine the constants and and also the allowed energies . However, there are [...]

[...] the harmonic oscillator potential shares one important feature with that of the particle in a box (infinite square well). Since the potential is a parabola in , its value increases to infinity in [...]

[...] harmonic oscillator potential is , and is a parabola that goes to infinity in both directions. The particle in a box potential (or infinite square well) has infinitely high walls at the ends of a fixed interval. Any [...]

[...] function in the Schrödinger equation goes to infinity at infinite distance (as is the case in the infinite square well and the harmonic oscillator), then the only allowed energies of a particle in such a system are [...]

[...] decays exponentially, while if , the wave function oscillates in some fashion. In the case of the infinite square well, is zero outside the well since the potential is infinite there, so there is zero chance of [...]

[...] in introductory quantum mechanics courses do violate one or more of them. For example, the ‘particle in a box‘ system is composed of a particle moving in a box with infinitely high sides, represented by [...]

[...] The infinite square well (particle in a box) [...]

[...] Required physics: Schrödinger equation, particle in a box [...]

[...] potential function. As a specific example of this we can look at the Schrödinger equation for the square well, between and [...]

[...] verify the uncertainty principle for the infinite square well. The Schrödinger equation for the square well is, between and [...]

[...] an example of an explicit case of a particle in the infinite square well, suppose we have a particle that starts off in a combination of the two lowest [...]

[...] another example of an explicit case of a particle in the infinite square well, suppose we modify the example in the last post so that the second stationary state has a constant [...]

[...] another example of an explicit case of a particle in the infinite square well, we can consider a particle that starts off with a triangular wave function, of [...]

[...] another example of an explicit case of a particle in the infinite square well, we can consider a particle that starts off in a state where it is equally likely to be found in [...]

[...] average or expectation value of the energy of a particle in an infinite square well can be worked out either by using the series solution in the [...]

[...] For example, we used the former in the solution for the free particle and the latter in the infinite square well. In fact these two ways are equivalent for writing a function, as we can [...]

[...] analyzed the infinite square well potential in the case where the potential [...]

[...] an example of the infinite square well potential suppose the particle starts off with the wave [...]

[...] a particle is in the ground state in an infinite square well in the interval . If the right wall suddenly moves to , what effect does this have on the allowable [...]

[...] a particle is in an infinite square well in the interval . We’re not specifying which state it’s in, so in general, its wave [...]

[...] can look for bound states () for this potential. From our analysis of the infinite and finite square wells, we can write down the wave function’s general [...]

[...] interesting potential is one where we combine an infinite square well with a delta function barrier. That [...]

[...] stationary states of the infinite square well [...]

[...] the ground state of the harmonic oscillator, and we can use the same technique to investigate the infinite square well. We [...]

[...] three-dimensional particle in a box problem is a fairly straightforward extension of the one dimensional case. The 3-d time-independent Schrödinger equation in rectangular coordinates [...]

[...] This is the same set of energies as in the one dimensional infinite square well. [...]

[...] differences between distinguishable particles and identical particles, consider 2 particles in the infinite square well. The wave functions for a single particle [...]

[...] an example, consider 2 particles in the infinite square well. The wave functions for a single particle [...]

[…] on the free electrons are ignored, and the free electrons move in what is effectively a 3-d infinite square well, where the potential is everywhere inside the solid and at the […]

[…] a simple example, suppose we have (noninteracting) particles in a one-dimensional infinite square well of width . The allowed energies for each particle […]

[…] of these formulas, we can consider the case of a delta-function perturbation in the centre of the infinite square well. That is, we […]

[…] of these formulas, we can consider the case of a delta-function perturbation in the centre of the infinite square well. That is, we […]

[…] use separation of variables so that . The equation is just that of the infinite square well, so its energy levels are given […]

[…] quantity on the RHS is twice the allowed energies of the ordinary infinite square well. Solving this for we […]

[…] a multi-state time dependent system (such as the infinite square well) suppose we introduce a perturbation which is a function of time only. That is, has the same […]

[…] dependent system. We start with a particle of mass in the ground state of the one dimensional infinite square well. At time the potential is changed […]