**Required math: vectors**

**Required physics: basics**

Reference: Griffiths, David J. (2007) Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3rd Edition; Prentice Hall – Sec. 2.1.3-2.1.4.

Electrostatics is the study of electric fields produced by collections of stationary charges. The basic problem that is solved in electrostatics is: given a collection or continuous distribution of charges, what is the net force on a test charge placed at a given position?

Experimentally, there are two principles or laws in electrostatics, both arising out of experiment (so they aren’t derived from anything more fundamental). The first is Coulomb’s law. Suppose we have one charge at position and a test charge at position . Coulomb’s law states that the electric force between the charges is directly proportional to the product of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. The force is directed along a line parallel to the distance between the two charges. As an equation, this comes out to

We’ve written the law in this way so that the last factor on the right produces a unit vector in the direction , which is a vector pointing from to .

The constant is known as the *permittivity of free space* and in SI units has the value

where charge is measured in coulombs (C), force in newtons (N) and distance in metres (m). The constant in Coulomb’s law thus comes out to

The second principle in electrostatics is the *principle of superposition*. This states that in a system with two or more point charges, or with a continuous distribution of charge (or a combination of the two), the total net force on the test charge is simply the vector sum of the forces due to each charge in the discrete case, and the integral of the forces in the continuous case.

This is a non-trivial assumption so it shouldn’t be glossed over. It states that the force between two charges is independent of any other charges that may be present. The same assumption is true in Newton’s theory of gravity.

Mathematically, the principle of superposition means that that total force on from a collection of point charges is

Ideally, we would like a way of describing the effect of a collection of charges without referring to a particular test charge, and from the above equation we can see a way of doing this. If we define , we get

where is called the *electric field*. We can see that it depends on the point where the test charge would be placed, but does not depend on the test charge itself.

For a continuous charge distribution, the corresponding definition of is a volume integral:

where is the location of the infinitesimal charge . The integral extends over all spatial locations containing charge.

The equations 6 and 7 are all we need to know in order to solve problems in electrostatics. As generations of physics students know, however, actually finding in a huge variety of geometric situations can provide endless hours of toil in trying to work out exotic sums and integrals.

On the philosophical side, one can ask what exactly the field is, physically (apart from a notational convenience in the working out of a force). Does an electric field exist in any independent sense? It’s a bit like asking if there is any sound if a tree falls in the forest and there is nobody there to hear it. The only way an electric field can be detected is by placing a test charge at some location and measuring the force on it. However, since a test charge would feel no force in the absence of an electric field, it seems legitimate to regard the electric field as something real.

## Trackbacks

[…] This is a special case of the electric dipole formula. A dipole is two charges with equal but opposite charge, and the dipole axis is the line connecting the two charges. The electric field on a line perpendicular to the dipole axis is parallel to the axis and is inverse cube with distance from the dipole. A more general formula would give the field due to the dipole at all points in space, but that’s bit more complicated than we want to get into here. Advertisement LD_AddCustomAttr("AdOpt", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Origin", "other"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_bg", "ffffff"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_border", "bc0404"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_text", "000000"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_link", "bc0404"); LD_AddCustomAttr("theme_url", "00447c"); LD_AddCustomAttr("LangId", "1"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Autotag", "soccer"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Tag", "electrodynamics"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Tag", "physics"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Tag", "electric-dipole"); LD_AddCustomAttr("Tag", "point-charges"); LD_AddSlot("LD_ROS_300-WEB"); LD_GetBids(); Share this:TwitterFacebookEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. By growescience, on September 6, 2011 at 15:38, under Electrodynamics, Physics. Tags: electric dipole, point charges. No Comments Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. « Coulomb’s law […]

[…] seen that we can calculate the electric field due to a continuous charge distribution by working out […]

[…] with a point charge at the origin and a spherical surface centred at the origin. By symmetry the electric field due to the point charge […]

[…] Coulomb's law « Physics tutorials […]

[…] (and fictional) world scenario for electrostatics arises if we alter the spatial dependence of Coulomb’s law so that the force between two charges […]

[…] the superposition principle, we can extend this result so that it applies to any distribution of charge within the […]

[…] you cast your mind back to the original definition of the electric field, we […]

[…] involving electric charge, current or magnetic fields. To see how this comes about, we return to Coulomb’s law for the force between two charges and separated by a distance which is, in SI […]

[…] is just Coulomb’s law from […]